Is Time Our Most Precious Commodity?

Plato called time a moving image of eternity. Aristotle made it the measure of change. Augustine found it in the mind’s attention. Newton cast it as the stage of nature. Einstein dissolved that stage, weaving time into the fabric of space itself: the fourth dimension.

And yet, in our own age, we have reduced time to currency, the raw material of productivity, the universal wage of living — a transformation E. P. Thompson traced in the rise of industrial capitalism.1 We are accustomed to treating it as something scarce, measurable, and tradable, as though its value could be indexed by calendars or clocks. But such arithmetic belongs to the machinery of productivity, not to the texture of memory and existence.

So, is time our most precious commodity? No, because time is not a commodity at all. If philosophy has long sought to define time’s nature, our age is defined by how we live it — or fail to. We cannot own, optimize, or hoard it. Time cannot be stored for later use or traded for something more valuable. It is not scarce, though we feel it so; it is not measurable, though we pretend it is. Time is the medium of our unfolding, the condition through which everything becomes real. To treat it as a resource is to confuse what we inhabit with what we possess. Time does not belong to us; we belong to it.

If so, what is time? Time is the gap between insight and action. Insight marks an event of understanding, the moment consciousness recognizes meaning. Action marks an event of embodiment, when that understanding is translated into the world.

Time constantly starts again through what we choose to do. It is the invisible thread connecting the realization of meaning with its expression in life. Within that threshold lies potential. The span between knowing and doing is not empty; it is where choice, hesitation, and creativity dwell — where new worlds begin. When you wait for someone at a café, time feels stretched out. The waiting becomes its own kind of time. This everyday experience of delay mirrors a deeper one: the pause between knowing and acting.2

Ethically, this delay defines moral life as the time it takes to act on what we know to be right; psychologically, it shapes our experience of duration by stretching time in hesitation and compressing it when understanding and action align, and existentially, when insight becomes movement—during creative flow or perfect intuition—time dissolves into presence and ceases to feel scarce. If time is the gap between insight and action, then in acting we make that freedom real — turning understanding into the world’s renewal.

Time, then, is not our most precious commodity but the condition of our becoming. To live well is not to save time, but to inhabit it.


  1. E. P. Thompson, “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism,” Past & Present 38 (1967): 56–97.
  2. Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), Part V: “Action.”

← Essays